The appellant appealed his conviction for robbery with firearm and disguise with intent, arguing the conviction was unreasonable.
The case was circumstantial, turning on the identity of the robber.
The trial judge found that a leather jacket and gloves were used in the robbery and abandoned near the scene.
The appellant's DNA was found on the jacket, and exclusively on the gloves.
The trial judge also found that the appellant had worn the same jacket approximately one month earlier in a booking video.
The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge's findings supported the conclusion that there was no other reasonable inference to be drawn, and the verdict was reasonable.
The appeal was dismissed.
