Following previously released reasons for judgment, the court considered written submissions from counsel regarding damages, pre-judgment interest, and costs.
The court determined that the parties had not been ad idem regarding the originally referenced damage amount and corrected the damages to a lower amount consistent with the evidence and an exhibit accepted as accurate.
The court also fixed pre-judgment interest from the fall of 2006 and reassessed the plaintiff’s costs in light of a prior offer to settle and the factors under the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The earlier judgment was amended to reflect the corrected damages, interest, and a consolidated costs award.
