The applicant sought judicial review of a RAD decision dismissing his appeal from the RPD.
The RPD rejected his claim based on credibility concerns, specifically regarding omissions from his BOC and a divorce certificate indicating he was in Sudan in 2011.
The RAD refused to admit a new witness statement explaining the divorce certificate because the applicant failed to justify why it was not provided when the appeal was perfected.
The Federal Court found the RAD's application of the evidentiary rules and its credibility findings to be reasonable.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.
