The applicant sought to reactivate a deferred human rights application past the 60-day deadline, claiming she believed her union was assisting her.
The respondents opposed reactivation and sought dismissal under section 45.1 of the Code.
The union requested intervenor status, which the applicant opposed.
The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting its interest in the employment discrimination application.
The Tribunal also directed the parties to file witness statements regarding the applicant's explanation for the delay, ruling that the applicant had waived solicitor-client privilege by raising the content of discussions with the union.
