Motion to compel document production granted in part; cross-motion for undertakings dismissed as res judicata.
The plaintiff brought a motion to compel the defendants to produce documents previously ordered by RSJ Sweeny, which were necessary for the plaintiff's expert to prepare a responding report on damages in a business partnership dispute.
The defendants brought a cross-motion to compel the plaintiff to answer outstanding undertakings and produce certain lease documents.
The court granted the plaintiff's motion in part, ordering the production of most requested corporate and financial documents, as well as the defendant Greg's income tax returns, finding them relevant and within the scope of the prior order.
The defendants' cross-motion was dismissed, as the request regarding undertakings was res judicata and there was insufficient evidence to order production of the lease documents.
SCJSuperior Court of JusticeJun 16, 2026
