The Respondent mother brought an urgent motion to enforce a prior order for the children's primary residence, add a police enforcement clause, and vary the father's access to be supervised or suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The father opposed, arguing the children wished to reside with him.
The Children's Aid Society (CAS) also sought to admit fresh evidence (surreptitious recordings) which was dismissed by the court.
The court found the father in breach of prior orders and that his actions empowered the children to disregard court orders.
The court granted the mother's motion, ordering the children's return to her care, adding a police enforcement clause, and mandating supervised access for the father, giving little weight to the children's stated preferences due to parental influence.
