The appellants appealed a Small Claims Court decision finding them liable for breach of a sponsorship agreement.
The Divisional Court upheld the trial judge's findings regarding the existence of the contract and the refusal to draw an adverse inference for failing to call a witness.
However, the court allowed the individual appellant's appeal, finding the trial judge erred in piercing the corporate veil to hold him personally liable, as there was no evidence the corporation was used for an improper purpose or that he agreed to personal liability.
