The applicant and respondent sought temporary decision-making responsibility orders for their child, primarily concerning vaccination.
The applicant also sought temporary child support.
The court disregarded the joint decision-making terms of their separation agreement, finding them no longer in the child's best interests due to fundamental disagreements on health care.
The court granted the applicant sole decision-making responsibility for health and educational issues, including vaccinations, and ordered the respondent to pay child support of $600 per month, consistent with the original agreement and guidelines.
The court declined to prohibit the father from discussing vaccines with the child but referred the matter to the Office of the Children's Lawyer.