The judgment creditor brought proceedings relating to continued contempt arising from the debtor’s failure to provide truthful and complete answers during examinations in aid of execution.
The debtor had previously served a 30‑day custodial sentence for contempt but continued to provide contradictory and misleading sworn evidence regarding financial dealings and transfers of funds.
The court found the debtor had repeatedly lied under oath and had not purged the contempt despite prior sanctions.
Rather than imposing additional incarceration, the court ordered that a further examination in aid of execution be conducted before a judicial officer to ensure truthful and complete disclosure of financial information.
The debtor was required to attend with all financial records and related documentation.