1 total
Motion to adjourn Drainage Act appeal dismissed due to lack of evidence for witness necessity and unrelated pending constitutional challenge.
The appellant moved to adjourn the hearing of an appeal under the Drainage Act on the grounds that four witnesses were out of the country and that a Constitutional Question was pending before the Superior Court.
The Tribunal dismissed the motion, finding that the appellant had not taken steps to summon the witnesses or provide evidence of their necessity, and that the Constitutional Question related to a distinct legal issue that did not operate as an automatic stay of the Tribunal proceedings.
