The applicant father brought a motion to permit day-to-day parenting decisions, including enrolling the child in after-school care, without the respondent mother's consent.
The mother brought a cross-motion seeking a right of first refusal, final decision-making, counselling for the child, a change in access exchange location, updated child support, and other procedural relief.
The court granted the father's request regarding day-to-day decisions and after-school care, finding it a practical solution given his criminal release conditions preventing contact with the mother.
The court dismissed the mother's requests for a right of first refusal, final decision-making, counselling, and changing the exchange location, citing the high-conflict nature of the case and lack of material change.
The court ordered updated child support based on the father's projected income and deferred questioning until after his criminal trial.
