1 total
Application for psychological treatment benefits dismissed as applicant failed to prove they were reasonable and necessary.
The applicant was injured in a motor vehicle accident and sought medical benefits for psychological services under two treatment plans.
The respondent denied the claims, arguing the treatments were either duplicative of previously approved plans or not reasonable and necessary.
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove the disputed treatment plans were reasonable and necessary, noting that the applicant had not fully consumed previously approved treatments and had ceased engaging in the proposed treatment.
The application for benefits was dismissed.
