The court considered interim costs submissions following the first stage of a bifurcated trial, which had dismissed the plaintiff's claims for declaratory relief.
The plaintiff argued that a costs award at this stage was premature, citing precedents that costs are typically awarded at the conclusion of the second stage of bifurcated proceedings.
The court agreed with the plaintiff, finding that a full appreciation of overall success and all relevant Rule 57 considerations, including Rule 49 offers, could only be made after the entire trial.
Consequently, the determination of costs was deferred to the completion of the proceedings.