The appellant was charged with a summary conviction offence under the Game Act.
The trial judge quashed the information for multiplicity.
The Court of Queen's Bench issued mandamus ordering the trial to proceed.
The Court of Appeal varied the order to allow the Crown to elect which charge to proceed upon, provided the information could be amended without injustice.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal, endorsing the Court of Appeal's practical approach, noting there was no express prohibition against multiple charges in the provincial Summary Convictions Act.
