This endorsement addresses costs following a successful paternity test motion brought by the respondent, Jose Vargas, which confirmed he was the biological father.
The applicant, Natasha Saunders, had opposed the paternity test and sought substantial costs, arguing her offer to settle was more favourable and the respondent's position on reimbursement of past child support was unreasonable given recent amendments to the Children's Law Reform Act.
The court awarded the applicant nominal costs, finding her offer on paternity consistent with the outcome, but also considering the respondent's self-represented status, the global nature of the applicant's costs claim, and the unnecessary proliferation of motions.
The decision also clarifies the application of Family Law Rule 24 regarding costs for earlier steps, particularly those before court officers without cost-ordering authority.