The accused challenged the admissibility of breathalyzer results, arguing that the police officer lacked the requisite reasonable suspicion to make an approved screening device demand.
The officer had stopped the accused after observing him drive away from a strip club notorious for drunk driving, noting bloodshot eyes and an admission of consuming one beer.
The court held that the officer's suspicion was objectively reasonable and the demand was lawful.
Consequently, the Charter application was dismissed, and the breath test results were ruled admissible.
