The Respondents moved to convert an oppression remedy application into an action, asserting material facts were in dispute.
The Applicants sought a sale of shares.
The court, exercising its case management authority, adjourned the conversion motion.
Instead, recognizing the parties' shared ultimate objective of a share divestment, the court ordered the Respondents to purchase the Applicant's shares and established a comprehensive timetable for expert valuation, aiming to expedite the resolution of the long-standing corporate dispute.
