The accused was tried for sexual assault and unlawful confinement of a young employee following a work-related meeting at the accused's home.
The employee became highly intoxicated and passed out, later waking up to find the accused sexually touching him.
The court applied the W.(D.) framework to assess credibility, rejecting the accused's denials and relying on the complainant's testimony, which was supported by circumstantial DNA evidence.
The accused was found guilty of sexual assault but acquitted of unlawful confinement due to reasonable doubt regarding physical restraint.
