The applicant brought a wide‑ranging family law motion seeking relief including exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, child and spousal support, disclosure, valuation of assets, and interim disbursements.
The respondent brought a competing motion seeking sale of the matrimonial home, changes to access, termination of a restraining order, and termination of interim financial obligations.
The court declined to order the sale of the matrimonial home and granted the applicant temporary exclusive possession, finding the sale would prejudice the applicant’s financial position and stability.
The court imputed income to the respondent based on lifestyle evidence and lack of disclosure, ordered interim child support and spousal support, and granted interim disbursements to level the litigation playing field.
The court also maintained the existing access schedule, refused to terminate the restraining order, and ordered extensive financial disclosure and asset valuation.