The moving party brought a motion for a temporary reduction of his spousal support obligation pending a full hearing on his Motion to Change, citing his medical release from the military and reliance on pension income.
The responding party brought a cross-motion for financial disclosure.
Applying the test for interim variation, the court found the moving party failed to establish urgency or hardship, and noted his failure to provide accurate and ongoing financial disclosure.
The motion for a temporary reduction in support was dismissed, and both parties were ordered to provide updated financial disclosure.
