Brendon Scott

The applicant was injured in a severe head-on motor vehicle collision while driving a commercial truck.

He sought various statutory accident benefits, including post-104 week income replacement benefits (IRBs), attendant care benefits, medical benefits, and the cost of several assessments.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant suffered a complete inability to engage in employment due to a combination of physical and psychological impairments, granting ongoing IRBs.

The Tribunal also approved funding for psychological treatment, a chronic pain assessment, a psychological assessment, and an occupational therapy driving assessment for catastrophic impairment determination.

However, claims for attendant care benefits, a mattress, a clinical file review fee, and a special award were dismissed.

This supplementary endorsement addresses a challenge to a sealing order granted in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings of Laurentian University of Sudbury.

The sealing order covered confidential correspondence between the University and the Ministry of Colleges and Universities, which Laurentian University argued contained sensitive information that, if disclosed, could jeopardize its restructuring efforts.

Parties opposing the sealing order contended there was no evidentiary basis for it.

Applying the two-branch test from Sierra Club of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Finance), the court found that the disclosure posed a real and substantial risk to the University's future viability, that the "commercial" interest extended to the broader community, and that no reasonable alternatives existed given ongoing mediation.

Consequently, the court maintained the confidentiality of the exhibits and the existing sealing order.