59 total
Grievance granted; employer ordered to rerun job competition due to flawed screening process.
The union filed a grievance alleging the grievor was improperly screened out and denied an interview for a permanent Trial Coordinator position.
The parties referred the matter to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.
The arbitrator found the screening process was flawed and ordered the employer to rerun the job competition, giving primary consideration to candidates' qualifications as of March 2017.
Employer directed to produce relevant portions of an inmate's health care record to Union counsel.
During a hearing concerning the termination of two Correctional Officers, an issue arose regarding the production of an inmate's health care record.
The Arbitrator directed the Employer to produce the relevant features of the health care record to Union counsel, subject to conditions restricting its use and dissemination.
Employer ordered to make grievor whole for pension and benefit contributions during approved leave.
The Union filed a grievance alleging the Employer violated the collective agreement by failing to make pension and benefit contributions for the grievor during an approved leave of absence.
The Arbitrator ordered the Employer to make the grievor whole in respect of pension contributions for the period in question, either directly or by providing funds to buy back pensionable service.
The Employer was also ordered to reimburse the grievor for eligible benefit expenses incurred during the leave upon provision of receipts.
Employer directed to produce WDHP report to the Union.
During a mediation, a production issue arose regarding a Workplace Discrimination and Harassment Prevention (WDHP) report involving the grievor.
The Arbitrator directed the Employer to produce the relevant WDHP report to the Union.
Complaint for pandemic pay dismissed after complainant failed to respond to Board direction.
The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.
The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.
The complainant failed to respond to the direction, and the Board dismissed the complaint.
The complainant, a Health Care Manager, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.
The complainant failed to respond to the direction.
Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.
Complaint for pandemic pay dismissed after the complainant failed to respond to a Board direction.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a new term of employment.
The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of that decision.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a term of employment not already existing in the contract.
The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.
Pandemic pay complaint dismissed after complainant failed to respond to Board direction.
The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint claiming temporary pandemic pay.
The complainant failed to respond to the Board's direction.
Complaint for pandemic pay dismissed after complainant failed to respond to Board directions.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a new term of employment.
The complainant, a Health Care Manager at a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.
Consequently, the complaint was dismissed without a hearing.
The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of the representative decision, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal without a hearing.
Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint.
Pandemic pay complaint dismissed after complainant failed to respond to Board direction following representative case.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to create new terms of employment.
Pandemic pay grievance dismissed after complainant failed to respond to Board direction.
The complainant failed to respond, and the complaint was dismissed.
The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a term of employment not existing in the contract.
The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of that decision.
Having received no response, the Board dismissed the complaint.
