The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment seeking $92,100 for unpaid loans, supported by three promissory notes signed by the defendant.
The defendant argued the matter required a trial due to credibility issues, claiming she had repaid earlier loans, that later funds were either 'parked' money or owed real estate commissions, and that she signed the final promissory note under duress.
The court found the defendant's version lacked credibility and corroborating evidence, while the plaintiff's case was supported by the promissory notes.
Summary judgment was granted in favour of the plaintiff for $92,100 plus costs.
