The defendant to the counterclaim brought a motion for security for costs against the plaintiff by counterclaim following an apartment fire.
The moving party relied on unpaid costs from a previous motion and argued the counterclaim was frivolous and vexatious.
The court found the moving party met its initial burden under Rules 56.01(1)(c) and (e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The responding party failed to demonstrate impecuniosity or that the counterclaim had a good chance of success.
The court ordered the responding party to post $14,000 in security for costs, payable in tranches.