The plaintiff bank brought a motion for contempt against the defendants for failing to attend examinations in aid of execution.
The court declined to grant the contempt order, noting that the plaintiff sought incarceration but failed to strictly comply with the personal service requirements of Rule 60.11 for the motion record.
The court ordered the defendants to attend for examination one more time and directed the plaintiff to properly serve the notices of examination and any subsequent contempt motion record personally or via an authorized alternative to personal service.
