A majority dismissed the appeal and upheld the sniffer-dog search during a traffic stop, finding objectively supported reasonable suspicion under s. 8 and no arbitrary detention under s. 9.
The majority held police training and experience may inform the totality-of-circumstances analysis, while neutral or equivocal factors remain relevant.
The dissent would have found insufficient objective grounds, Charter breaches, and exclusion of the marihuana evidence under s. 24(2).
