The plaintiff brought a motion to strike the defendants' Affidavit of Documents or, alternatively, their Statement of Defence, alleging that the defendants fabricated emails central to their defence.
The court found that the defendants deliberately included fabricated documents in their Affidavit of Documents, constituting an abuse of the court's process and an affront to the integrity of justice.
The court granted the motion, striking the defendants' Statement of Defence and ordering them to pay the plaintiff's costs.
