The accused, T.A., was charged with sexual assault and sexual interference against a 10-year-old complainant.
The trial proceeded judge-alone, with the Crown presenting evidence from the complainant and the defence calling the accused.
The court assessed the complainant's credibility and reliability, noting inconsistencies in her testimony.
Applying the principles of reasonable doubt and the W.(D.) analysis, the court found that the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the touching was for a sexual purpose, which is an essential element for both charges.
Consequently, T.A. was acquitted on both counts.