The applicant sought a stay of the respondent's motion to change parenting and support terms from a previous final order, pending payment of outstanding costs.
The court dismissed the respondent's motion to change parenting terms as the child had reached the age of majority (18).
The court granted a stay of the respondent's motion to change support terms, finding the respondent had wilfully failed to pay the previously ordered costs and his claims of impecuniosity were disingenuous.
The stay is conditional on the respondent paying a significant portion of the outstanding costs.
