The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of disability after suffering a massive heart attack.
Following his return to work, he experienced a temporary reduction in hours, was required to take full days off for medical appointments, and was assigned to a different truck.
His employment was ultimately terminated.
The Tribunal found that the reduction in hours was due to seasonal business fluctuations, the medical appointment policy was a reasonable operational requirement, and the truck assignment was unrelated to his health.
The Tribunal concluded that the termination was based on the applicant's repeated complaints and inappropriate comments to a customer, not his disability.
The application was dismissed.
