The plaintiff brought a motion for leave to amend its statement of claim to add allegations of secret commissions and intentional interference with economic relations, and to disqualify the defendants' counsel from acting for a proposed new defendant.
The defendants brought a cross-motion for case management and a timetable.
The court denied the contested amendments without prejudice, finding the plaintiff failed to plead full particulars as required by Rule 25.06(8).
The court also dismissed the motion to disqualify counsel, finding no clear evidence of a conflict of interest.
Case management was denied, but a timetable was ordered.
Costs of $10,000 were awarded to the defendants.
