The applicant sought judicial review of an Immigration Appeal Division decision dismissing her spousal sponsorship appeal.
The IAD found the marriage genuine but entered into primarily for acquiring immigration status.
The applicant argued the decision misunderstood the legal framework, misapprehended evidence, and relied on discriminatory stereotypes regarding the spouse's HIV status.
The Federal Court dismissed the application, finding the IAD's assessment of the primary purpose of the marriage reasonable and supported by the spouse's significant immigration history and conduct aimed at remaining in Canada.
