3 total
The court maintained the children in agency care on consent, criticizing the agency's procedural delays.
The Children and Family Services for York Region brought a Protection Application and urgent motion, leading to a Temporary Care and Custody Hearing for two children.
The Society sought to place the children with the father for six months, but the court declined, instead maintaining the children in the Society's care via a new order, which the parents consented to.
The judge criticized the Society's delay in commencing the Protection Application, highlighting the importance of timely judicial oversight and access to legal representation for parents.
Children placed in temporary society care as supervision order deemed insufficient to ensure their safety.
The child protection agency brought a motion regarding the care of two young children during an adjournment period.
The agency initially sought a supervision order placing the children with the father, but the court found that a supervision order would not adequately protect the children due to recent breaches of safety plans, domestic violence, and substance abuse concerns.
The court ordered that the children be placed in the temporary care and custody of the agency on a without prejudice basis.
Motion for child contact dismissed pending a risk assessment regarding sexual assault allegations.
The Respondent father sought a contact order for his two sons after a temporary no-contact order was issued due to serious sexual assault allegations made by the Applicant mother's 15-year-old daughter against him, which were verified by Simcoe Muskoka Child, Youth and Family Services.
The court dismissed the father's motion for contact, emphasizing that the best interests of all three children, including the alleged victim, were paramount.
The court highlighted the importance of a risk assessment, which the father refused to undergo, and distinguished prior case law based on recent amendments to the Children's Law Reform Act concerning family violence.
