The applicant sought judicial review of a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) decision, alleging her former counsel was incompetent for failing to submit certain evidence.
The Court dismissed the application, finding that the new evidence (regarding her alleged conversion to Christianity, domestic abuse, health issues, and sur place claim) largely pre-dated the rejection of her original refugee claim and would have been inadmissible on a PRRA.
The applicant failed to establish a reasonable probability that the outcome of her PRRA application would have been different with the new evidence.
