2 total
Motion for a stay of removal dismissed.
The applicants sought a stay of their removal to Nigeria pending their application for leave and for judicial review of a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) decision.
The PRRA officer had found the applicants not credible and identified Port Harcourt as a safe Internal Flight Alternative.
The Court dismissed the motion for a stay, finding the applicants failed to establish a serious issue regarding the officer's findings or irreparable harm, as the alleged risks had already been reasonably assessed and rejected.
Motion for a stay of removal dismissed as the applicant failed to establish irreparable harm regarding previously assessed risks.
The applicant brought a motion to stay her removal to Nigeria pending her application for leave and judicial review of a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment decision.
The applicant claimed she faced persecution in Nigeria based on her sexual orientation, a risk that had been previously rejected by the RPD, an H&C officer, and the PRRA officer.
The Federal Court dismissed the motion, finding that the applicant failed to establish a serious issue or irreparable harm, and that the balance of convenience favoured the Minister given her past failure to report for removal.
