This is an evidentiary ruling in a status review proceeding under the Child and Family Services Act concerning the admissibility of the views and wishes of two children (ages 14 and 11) who are represented by counsel from the Office of the Children's Lawyer.
The central issue is whether hearsay statements reflecting the children's residential preferences, expressed to their legal representative and other witnesses, are admissible at trial.
The children are not being called to testify.
The mother opposes admission of this evidence, while the father, the society, and the children's counsel support it.
The court rules that such evidence is admissible under the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule, as it reflects the children's mental state regarding their residential preferences, which is a mandatory consideration under the statute.