The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's denial of various treatment plans, an income replacement benefit (IRB) deficit, and seeking an award for unreasonable delay.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the proposed treatment plans for physiotherapy, optometric services, concussion therapy, occupational therapy, and pharmacotherapy were reasonable and necessary, preferring the evidence of the applicant's treating specialists over the respondent's independent examiners.
However, the Tribunal dismissed the claims for the IRB deficit and the outstanding balance for psychological therapy due to insufficient evidence.
The request for an award under s. 10 of Regulation 664 was also dismissed, as the respondent's conduct did not meet the threshold of being unreasonable.
