The applicant mother sought to temporarily suspend or supervise the father's parenting time and requested the appointment of the Office of the Children's Lawyer.
The respondent father brought a cross-motion for contempt, alleging breaches of a prior parenting order due to the mother's intentional withholding of their son.
The court dismissed the mother's motion, finding her supporting evidence inadmissible and her actions to be self-help.
While the court found the mother intentionally breached the parenting order, it exercised its discretion not to issue a formal contempt finding, instead declaring the breach and imposing conditions to ensure future compliance, including ordering the mother to pay the father full indemnity costs.