In a family law proceeding involving disputes over custody and property equalization, the respondent brought a motion seeking sole custody of the child, removal of restrictions on withdrawals from certain bank accounts imposed by an earlier order, and other procedural relief.
The applicant brought a cross‑motion seeking compliance with outstanding undertakings and disclosure obligations.
The court found the earlier financial restrictions had unfairly limited the respondent’s ability to support the children and fund legal representation, and ordered the removal of the withdrawal limits.
Relying on the views and preferences of the nearly 16‑year‑old child conveyed through the Office of the Children’s Lawyer, the court granted the respondent permanent custody subject to specified access.
The court also directed steps toward resolution of the central dispute concerning the parties’ separation date and potential equalization claim.
