The appellant appealed his conviction and sentence, arguing the trial judge erred in instructing the jury on accomplice evidence and that the verdict was unreasonable.
He also appealed his designation as a dangerous offender, arguing he should have been designated a long-term offender.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding no error in the jury instructions and ample evidence to support the verdict.
The sentence appeal was also dismissed, as medical evidence supported the finding that the appellant was not amenable to treatment, justifying the dangerous offender designation.
