The plaintiffs appealed an Associate Justice's order granting the defendant security for costs.
The underlying action challenged an arbitration decision that ordered the plaintiffs to transfer a domain name to the defendant.
The plaintiffs argued the defendant unreasonably chose Ontario as the jurisdiction for the dispute, making the security for costs order unjust.
The Superior Court found no palpable and overriding error in the Associate Justice's conclusion that the defendant's choice of Ontario, where the domain registrar was located, was reasonable given the plaintiffs' use of a privacy registration service.
The appeal was dismissed.
