The appellants appealed a trial judgment awarding the respondent $24,882.30, representing the return of a deposit paid for a baling system machine.
The appellants argued the trial judge erred in finding the partnership, rather than the corporation, was a party to the contract.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding ample evidence to support the trial judge's conclusions regarding the parties to the contract, the breach of contract, and the dismissal of the counterclaim based on credibility findings.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
