The Administrator of a consumer proposal brought a motion to approve legal fees incurred for registering a restrictive covenant against the debtor's property as security for the proposal.
The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy opposed the fees, arguing they were not prescribed by Rule 129 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.
The court dismissed the motion, holding that the fees prescribed in Rule 129 are exhaustive for Division II consumer proposals, and any administration requiring additional fees must be pursued as a Division I proposal.
