Following a high‑conflict family law proceeding, the court determined issues of access, spousal support, and equalization of net family property after the parties’ separation and litigation history involving multiple interim orders.
The respondent, who suffered from significant mental health issues and was residing in a psychiatric facility, sought spousal support and contact with the children.
The court held that access was not in the children’s best interests given the history of trauma and lack of contact for several years.
The court also rejected the respondent’s spousal support claim, finding no demonstrated need and no ability to pay given the applicant’s financial obligations for the children.
Equalization was calculated and offset against an existing costs award.
