The applicant sought judicial review of a Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) decision dismissing her claims of workplace discrimination and reprisal against her former employer.
She alleged the HRTO hearing was procedurally unfair and demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The Divisional Court applied the reasonableness standard of review and found that the HRTO's procedural rulings, including the admission of hearsay evidence and late-filed documents, were fair and within its discretion.
The court concluded the HRTO's dismissal of the discrimination and reprisal allegations was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
The application for judicial review was dismissed with costs.