The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision which found her injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant argued the adjudicator erred in law by requiring a diagnosis of chronic pain to remove her from the MIG, and erred in fact by failing to consider evidence of functional impairment.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding the adjudicator correctly applied the law regarding chronic pain and functional impairment, and adequately considered the evidence.
