The mother brought motions for contempt against the father for failing to facilitate supervised access as ordered, and for joint custody with increased access.
The father cross-moved to vary the access order, citing concerns over the mother's past drug addiction and the child's anxiety.
The court found the father in contempt for deliberately disobeying the clear terms of the access order, but suspended any penalty to allow him to purge the contempt by complying with a new schedule.
The court deferred the issue of custody to trial but ordered a gradually increasing access schedule for the mother, transitioning to unsupervised and overnight access, conditional on her providing random negative drug tests.