A. Max

The defendant successfully moved to reduce the plaintiff's construction lien on the basis that it was wilfully exaggerated.

The parties could not agree on costs for the motion.

The court awarded the defendant costs on a substantial indemnity basis, finding that the plaintiff's conduct in wilfully exaggerating the lien warranted a higher scale of costs to deter such practices in the construction community.

Costs were fixed at $34,500.

The defendant moved to discharge the plaintiff's construction lien under section 47 of the Construction Act, arguing it was wilfully exaggerated and an abuse of process.

The lien related to biohazard remediation services following a death at the property.

The court found insufficient evidence to summarily discharge the lien as an abuse of process, noting triable issues regarding the agreed scope of work.

However, the court found that portions of the lien were wilfully exaggerated, including unsubstantiated labour hours and opportunistic billing increases.

The court reduced the lien amount by $48,041.80 pursuant to section 35 of the Construction Act.