The parties brought cross-motions for interim relief in a family law proceeding.
The mother sought sole decision-making responsibility, while the father sought sole or shared parenting, partition and sale of the matrimonial home, and occupation rent.
The court granted the mother final decision-making responsibility after consultation with the father, noting the history of domestic violence and the father's failure to accept responsibility.
The court dismissed the father's requests to change the supervised parenting schedule, finding no exceptional circumstances to vary the existing interim order.
The father's claims for partition and sale and occupation rent were also dismissed as premature and inappropriate on an interim basis.