The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the insurer's determination that her injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant argued that her pre-existing psychological conditions, chronic pain, and accident-related psychological impairments warranted removal from the MIG.
The Tribunal found the medical evidence insufficient to establish that her pre-existing conditions precluded recovery within the MIG, or that she suffered from chronic pain or accident-related psychological impairments.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claim for non-earner benefits, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate a complete inability to carry on a normal life.
The application was dismissed in its entirety.